Home  ›  If the President Is Impeached

If the President Is Impeached

Written By Thursday, March 17, 2022 Add Comment Edit

Process for charging a public official with legal offenses by the legislature(south)

This commodity is most the procedure of charging a public official. For challenging a witness in a legal proceeding, run into Witness impeachment.

Brazilian president Dilma Rousseff (left) and Due south Korean president Park Geun-Hye (right) were both impeached and removed from part in 2016.

Impeachment is the process by which a legislative body or other legally constituted tribunal initiates charges against a public official for misconduct.[1] [2] It may be understood every bit a unique process involving both political and legal elements.[3] [4] [5]

In Europe and Latin America impeachment tends to exist confined to ministerial officials[6] every bit the unique nature of their positions may place ministers beyond the reach of the police to prosecute, or their misconduct is not codified into law as an offense except through the unique expectations of their loftier office. Both "peers and commoners" have been subject to the procedure even so.[7] From 1990 to 2020 there have been at least 272 impeachment charges confronting 132 different heads of state in 63 countries.[8] Most democracies (with the notable exception of the United States) involve the courts (often a national constitutional courtroom) in some way.[9] [i]

In Latin America, which includes nigh 40% of the world's presidential systems, 10 presidents from six countries were removed from office by their national legislatures via impeachments or declarations of incapacity between 1978 and 2019.[10]

National legislations differ regarding both the consequences and definition of impeachment, but the intent is nearly always to expeditiously vacate the office. In most nations the process begins in the lower house of a bicameral assembly who bring charges of misconduct, and then the upper house administers a trial and sentencing.[half-dozen] Most commonly, an official is considered impeached after the house votes to accept the charges, and impeachment itself does not remove the official from office.[six]

Considering impeachment involves a deviation from the normal constitutional procedures by which individuals achieve high office (election, ratification, or date) and because information technology generally requires a supermajority, they are commonly reserved for those deemed to accept committed serious abuses of their part.[xi] In the Usa, for instance, impeachment at the federal level is limited to those who may accept committed "Treason, Bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors"—the latter phrase referring to offenses against the authorities or the constitution, grave abuses of power, violations of the public trust, or other political crimes, fifty-fifty if not indictable criminal offenses.[4] [12] Under the U.s.a. Constitution, the House of Representatives has the sole power of impeachments while the Senate has the sole power to try impeachments (i.e., to acquit or convict); the validity of an impeachment trial is a political question that is nonjusticiable (i.e.., is not reviewable past the courts).[13] In the United states of america, impeachment is a remedial rather than penal process,[13] [14] : eight intended to "effectively 'maintain constitutional government' by removing individuals unfit for function";[fourteen] : 8 persons discipline to impeachment and removal remain "liable and bailiwick to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Police."[fourteen]

Impeachment is provided for in the ramble laws of many countries including Brazil, French republic, India, Republic of ireland, the Philippines, Russia, South Korea, and the U.s.. Information technology is distinct from the motility of no confidence procedure bachelor some countries whereby a movement of censure tin exist used to remove a authorities and its ministers from office. Such a procedure is not applicable in countries with presidential forms of government like the Us.[fifteen]

Etymology and history [edit]

The word "impeachment" probable derives from Onetime French empeechier from Latin word impedīre expressing the idea of communicable or ensnaring by the 'foot' (pes, pedis), and has analogues in the modern French verb empêcher (to prevent) and the modern English impede. Medieval popular etymology also associated it (wrongly) with derivations from the Latin impetere (to attack).

The process was first used by the English language "Good Parliament" confronting William Latimer, 4th Businesswoman Latimer in the second half of the 14th century. Following the English language case, the constitutions of Virginia (1776), Massachusetts (1780) and other states thereafter adopted the impeachment mechanism, only they restricted the punishment to removal of the official from part.

In West Africa, Kings of the Ashanti Empire who violated whatever of the oaths taken during his or her enstoolment, were destooled past Kingmakers.[xvi] For instance, if a king punished citizens arbitrarily or was exposed to be decadent, he would exist destooled. Destoolment entailed Kingmakers removing the sandals of the king and bumping his buttocks on the ground three times. Once destooled from office, his sanctity and thus reverence are lost every bit he cannot practice whatever powers he had as king; this includes Chief administrator, Guess, and Armed services Commander. The at present previous male monarch is disposed of the Stool, swords and other regalia which symbolize his office and say-so. He also loses the position as custodian of the land. However, despite being destooled from office, the rex remains a member of the Purple Family from which he was elected.[xvi]

In diverse jurisdictions [edit]

Brazil [edit]

In Brazil, as in most other Latin American countries, "impeachment" refers to the definitive removal from office. The president of Brazil may exist provisionally removed from office by the Chamber of Deputies and and so tried and definitely removed from office by the Federal Senate. The Brazilian Constitution requires that two-thirds of the Deputies vote in favor of the opening of the impeachment procedure of the President and that ii-thirds of the Senators vote for impeachment. State governors and municipal mayors tin also be impeached by the respective legislative bodies. Article 2 of Law no. 1.079, from 10 April 1950, or "The Law of Impeachment", states that "The crimes defined in this law, even when simply attempted, are subject to the penalty of loss of office, with disqualification for up to five years for the exercise of any public function, to be imposed by the Federal Senate in proceedings against the President of the Commonwealth, Ministers of State, Ministers of the Supreme Federal Tribunal, or the Attorney Full general."

Initiation: An accusation of a responsibility crime confronting the President may be brought by whatever Brazilian citizen however the President of the Chamber of Deputies holds prerogative to take the charge, which if accustomed will be read at the side by side session and reported to the President of the Democracy.

Boggling Committee: An extraordinary commission is elected with member representation from each party proportional to that party's membership. The President is and so allowed x parliamentary sessions for defense, which lead to ii legislative sessions to class a rapporteur's legal opinion equally to if impeachment proceedings will or will not exist sent for a trial in the Senate. The rapporteur'south opinion is voted on in the Committee; and on a simple majority information technology may be accepted. Failing that, the Commission adopts an opinion produced by the majority. For example, if the rapporteur's stance is that no impeachment is warranted, and the Committee vote fails to accept it, then the Committee adopts the stance to proceed with impeachment. Likewise, if the rapporteur's opinion is to go along with impeachment, but it fails to reach majority in the Committee, then the Committee adopts the opinion non to impeach. If the vote succeeds, then the rapporteur's stance is adopted.

Bedroom of Deputies: The Chamber bug a call-out vote to take the opinion of the Committee, requiring either a supermajority of two thirds in favor of an impeachment stance (or a supermajority of two thirds against a dismissal stance) of the Committee, in order to authorize the Senate impeachment proceedings. The President is suspended (provisionally removed) from office every bit soon every bit the Senate receives and accepts from the Bedroom of Deputies the impeachment charges and decides to go on with a trial.

The Senate: The process in the Senate had been historically lacking in procedural guidance until 1992, when the Senate published in the Official Diary of the Union the step-by-step process of the Senate'southward impeachment procedure, which involves the germination of another special committee and closely resembles the lower house procedure, with fourth dimension constraints imposed on the steps taken. The committee'due south opinion must exist presented within 10 days, after which it is put to a telephone call-out vote at the next session. The vote must proceed within a single session; the vote on President Rousseff took over 20 hours. A simple majority vote in the Senate begins formal deliberation on the complaint, immediately suspends the President from part, installs the Vice President as acting president, and begins a 20-solar day menstruation for written defense besides as upwardly to 180-days for the trial. In the event the trial proceeds slowly and exceeds 180 days, the Brazilian Constitution determines that the President is entitled to return and stay provisionally in role until the trial comes to its decision.

Senate plenary deliberation: The commission interrogates the accused or their counsel, from which they take a right to abstain, and also a probative session which guarantees the accused rights to contradiction, or audiatur et altera pars, assuasive access to the courts and due process of police force under Article v of the constitution. The accused has xv days to present written arguments in defense and answer to the evidence gathered, so the committee shall issue an stance on the claim within ten days. The entire package is published for each senator earlier a single plenary session problems a call-out vote, which shall proceed to trial on a simple majority and close the instance otherwise.

Senate trial: A hearing for the complainant and the accused convenes within 48 hours of notification from deliberation, from which a trial is scheduled by the president of the Supreme Court no less than ten days afterward the hearing. The senators sit as judges, while witnesses are interrogated and cross-examined; all questions must be presented to the president of the Supreme Court, who, as prescribed in the Constitution, presides over the trial. The president of the Supreme Courtroom allots fourth dimension for argue and rebuttal, after which time the parties leave the chamber and the senators deliberate on the indictment. The President of the Supreme Court reads the summary of the grounds, the charges, the defense and the evidence to the Senate. The senators in turn issue their sentence. On conviction by a supermajority of two thirds, the president of the Supreme Courtroom pronounces the sentence and the accused is immediately notified. If there is no supermajority for conviction, the defendant is acquitted.

Upon conviction, the officer has his or her political rights revoked for eight years, which bars them from running for any office during that time.[17]

Fernando Collor de Mello, the 32nd President of Brazil, resigned in 1992 amidst impeachment proceedings. Despite his resignation, the Senate nonetheless voted to convict him and bar him from property any part for eight years, due to evidence of bribery and misappropriation.

In 2016, the Chamber of Deputies initiated an impeachment case against President Dilma Rousseff on allegations of budgetary mismanagement, a crime of responsibleness under the Constitution.[eighteen] On 12 May 2016, after xx hours of deliberation, the admissibility of the accusation was approved past the Senate with 55 votes in favor and 22 against (an accented majority would have been sufficient for this step) and Vice President Michel Temer was notified to assume the duties of the President pending trial. On Baronial 31, 61 senators voted in favor of impeachment and xx voted against it, thus achieving the 2⁄three majority needed for Rousseff'southward definitive removal. A vote to disqualify her for five years was taken and failed (in spite of the Constitution not separating disqualification from removal) having less than two thirds in favor.[17]

Croatia [edit]

The process of impeaching the president of Croatia can be initiated by a ii-thirds majority vote in favor in the Sabor and is thereafter referred to the Ramble Court, which must accept such a proposal with a 2-thirds bulk vote in favor in order for the president to be removed from office. This has never occurred in the history of the Republic of Republic of croatia. In case of a successful impeachment motion a president's constitutional term of five years would be terminated and an ballot called within 60 days of the vacancy occurring. During the period of vacancy the presidential powers and duties would be carried out by the speaker of the Croatian Parliament in his/her chapters as Interim President of the Republic.[xix]

Czech Commonwealth [edit]

In 2013, the constitution was inverse. Since 2013, the process can be started by at least three-fifths of present senators, and must be approved by at least three-fifths of all members of the Sleeping accommodation of Deputies within three months. As well, the President can be impeached for high treason (newly divers in the Constitution) or whatsoever serious infringement of the Constitution.[20]

The procedure starts in the Senate of the Czech republic which has the right to just impeach the president. Afterwards the approval past the Chamber of Deputies, the case is passed to the Ramble Court of the Czech Republic, which has to decide the verdict against the president. If the Court finds the President guilty, so the President is removed from office and is permanently barred from being elected President of the Czech Republic again.[21]

No Czech president has always been impeached, though members of the Senate sought to impeach President Václav Klaus in 2013.[22] This case was dismissed by the courtroom, which reasoned that his mandate had expired.[23] The Senate besides proposed to impeach president Miloš Zeman in 2019 [24] only the Chamber of Deputies did not vote on the issue in time and thus the case did not fifty-fifty keep to the Court.

Denmark [edit]

In Denmark the possibility for current and one-time ministers existence impeached was established with the Danish Constitution of 1849. Unlike many other countries Denmark does non accept a Constitutional Court who would normally handle these types of cases. Instead Denmark has a special Court of Impeachment (In Danish: Rigsretten) which is called upon every time a electric current and former minister have been impeached. The office of the Impeachment Court is to process and deliver judgments against current and former ministers who are accused of unlawful comport in function. The legal content of ministerial responsibility is laid down in the Ministerial Accountability Human activity which has its background in section 13 of the Danish Constitution, according to which the ministers' accountability is determined in more than detail by law. In Denmark the normal practice in terms of impeachment cases is that it needs to be brought upwards in the Danish Parliament (Folketing) get-go for debate between the different members and parties in the parliament. Later on the debate the members of the Danish Parliament vote on whether a current or former minister needs to be impeached. If there is a majority in the Danish Parliament for an impeachment case confronting a current or former minister, an Impeachment Court is called into session. In Denmark the Impeachment Court consists of up to 15 Supreme Court judges and xv parliament members appointed past the Danish Parliament. The members of the Impeachment Court in Kingdom of denmark serve a six-year term in this position.[25]

In 1995 the onetime Minister of Justice Erik Ninn-Hansen from the Bourgeois People's Party was impeached in connexion with the Tamil Case. The example was centered around the illegal processing of family reunification applications. From September 1987 to Jan 1989 applications for family reunification of Tamil refugees from civil state of war-torn Sri Lanka were put on hold in violation of Danish and International law. On 22 June 1995, Ninn-Hansen was found guilty of violating paragraph v subsection i of the Danish Ministerial Responsibility Act which says: A government minister is punished if he intentionally or through gross negligence neglects the duties incumbent on him under the constitution or legislation in general or according to the nature of his post. A majority of the judges in that impeachment instance voted for former Minister of Justice Erik Ninn-Hansen to receive a suspended sentence of iv months with i year of probation. The reason why the sentence was made suspended was specially in relation to Ninn-Hansen's personal circumstances, in particular, his health and historic period - Ninn-Hansen was 73 years erstwhile when the sentence was handed downwards. After the verdict, Ninn-Hansen complained to the European Court of Human Rights and complained, among other things, that the Court of Impeachment was not impartial. The European Court of Man Rights dismissed the complaint on 18 May 1999. As a direct result and consequence of this case, the Conservative-led government and Prime number Minister at that time Poul Schlüter was forced to stride downward from power.[26] [27]

In February 2021 the old Minister for Immigration and Integration Inger Støjberg at that time member of the Danish Liberal Party Venstre was impeached when it was discovered that she had possibly against both Danish and International police tried to separate couples in refugee centres in Denmark, as the wives of the couples were nether legal historic period. According to a commission report Inger Støjberg had besides lied in the Danish Parliament and failed to written report relevant details to the Parliamentary Ombudsman[28] The decision to initiate an impeachment case was adopted by the Danish Parliament with a 141–thirty vote and decision (In Denmark 90 members of the parliament need to vote for impeachment before it can be implemented). On 13 December 2021 onetime Government minister for Immigration and Integration Inger Støjberg was convicted by the special Courtroom of Impeachment of separating asylum seeker families illegally according to Danish and international law and sentenced to threescore days in prison house.[29] The majority of the judges in the special Court of Impeachment (25 out of 26 judges) institute that it had been proven that Inger Støjberg on 10 Feb 2016 decided that an accommodation scheme should use without the possibility of exceptions, then that all aviary-seeking spouses and cohabiting couples where one was a minor aged fifteen–17, had to be separated and accommodated separately in dissever asylum centers.[30] On 21 December, a majority in the Folketing voted that the sentence means that she is no longer worthy of sitting in the Folketing and she therefore immediately lost her seat.[31]

France [edit]

In France the comparable procedure is chosen destitution. The president of France tin can exist impeached by the French Parliament for willfully violating the Constitution or the national laws. The process of impeachment is written in the 68th article of the French Constitution.[32] A group of senators or a group of members of the National Assembly can begin the process. Then, both the National Assembly and the Senate must acknowledge the impeachment. After the upper and lower houses' agreement, they unite to class the High Court. Finally, the High Court must determine to declare the impeachment of the president of France—or not.

Federal republic of germany [edit]

The federal president of Deutschland can be impeached both by the Bundestag and by the Bundesrat for willfully violating federal constabulary. Once the Bundestag or the Bundesrat impeaches the president, the Federal Constitutional Courtroom decides whether the President is guilty as charged and, if this is the example, whether to remove him or her from function. The Federal Constitutional Court as well has the ability to remove federal judges from function for willfully violating core principles of the federal constitution or a land constitution. The impeachment procedure is regulated in Commodity 61 of the Basic Police force for the Federal republic of germany.

There is no formal impeachment process for the chancellor of Germany, nonetheless the Bundestag tin can replace the chancellor at any time past voting for a new chancellor (effective vote of no confidence, Article 67 of the Basic Law).

There has never been an impeachment against the President and then far. Constructive votes of no confidence against the chancellor occurred in 1972 and 1982, with only the second 1 existence successful.

Hong Kong [edit]

The chief executive of Hong Kong can be impeached past the Legislative Quango. A motion for investigation, initiated jointly by at to the lowest degree 1-fourth of all the legislators charging the Chief Executive with "serious breach of constabulary or dereliction of duty" and refusing to resign, shall get-go exist passed past the council. An independent investigation committee, chaired by the chief justice of the Court of Final Appeal, will then carry out the investigation and study back to the council. If the Council observe the evidence sufficient to substantiate the charges, it may pass a motion of impeachment past a two-thirds majority.[33] : Article 73(9)

However, the Legislative Quango does non take the power to actually remove the chief executive from office, equally the chief executive is appointed by the Central People'south Regime (State Council of Communist china). The council can just report the result to the Key People's Regime for its decision.[33] : Article 45

Republic of hungary [edit]

Article 13 of Hungary's Fundamental Law (constitution) provides for the process of impeaching and removing the president. The president enjoys immunity from criminal prosecution while in office, but may be charged with crimes committed during his term afterwards. Should the president violate the constitution while discharging his duties or commit a willful criminal offence, he may be removed from office. Removal proceedings may be proposed past the concurring recommendation of one-fifth of the 199 members of the land's unicameral Parliament. Parliament votes on the proposal by secret ballot, and if 2 thirds of all representatives agree, the president is impeached. Once impeached, the president's powers are suspended, and the Constitutional Courtroom decides whether or non the President should be removed from role.[34] [35]

Bharat [edit]

The president and judges, including the principal justice of the supreme courtroom and high courts, can be impeached past the parliament earlier the expiry of the term for violation of the Constitution. Other than impeachment, no other penalty can be given to a president in position for the violation of the Constitution nether Commodity 361 of the constitution. However a president subsequently his/her term/removal tin can exist punished for his already proven unlawful activeness under disrespecting the constitution, etc.[36] No president has faced impeachment proceedings. Hence, the provisions for impeachment have never been tested. The sitting president cannot be charged and needs to step down in order for that to happen.

Ireland [edit]

In the Commonwealth of Republic of ireland formal impeachment applies just to the Irish president. Commodity 12 of the Irish Constitution provides that, unless judged to be "permanently incapacitated" by the Supreme Courtroom, the president can be removed from role only by the houses of the Oireachtas (parliament) and merely for the committee of "stated misbehaviour". Either house of the Oireachtas may impeach the president, just only past a resolution approved by a majority of at least two thirds of its total number of members; and a firm may not consider a proposal for impeachment unless requested to do so by at least thirty of its number.

Where i house impeaches the president, the remaining house either investigates the charge or commissions some other body or committee to do so. The investigating house tin remove the president if it decides, by at least a two-thirds majority of its members, both that the president is guilty of the accuse and that the charge is sufficiently serious as to warrant the president's removal. To appointment no impeachment of an Irish gaelic president has always taken place. The president holds a largely ceremonial office, the dignity of which is considered important, so it is likely that a president would resign from role long earlier undergoing formal conviction or impeachment.

Italian republic [edit]

In Italy, according to Article 90 of the Constitution, the President of Italy can exist impeached through a majority vote of the Parliament in articulation session for high treason and for attempting to overthrow the Constitution. If impeached, the president of the Democracy is then tried past the Constitutional Court integrated with xvi citizens older than twoscore chosen by lot from a list compiled past the Parliament every nine years.

Italian press and political forces made use of the term "impeachment" for the attempt past some members of parliamentary opposition to initiate the procedure provided for in Article 90 against Presidents Francesco Cossiga (1991),[37] [ better source needed ] Giorgio Napolitano (2014)[38] [ amend source needed ] and Sergio Mattarella (2018).[39] [ amend source needed ]

Japan [edit]

By Article 78 of the Constitution of Japan, judges can be impeached.[forty] The voting method is specified by laws. The National Diet has two organs, namely [裁判官訴追委員会] Error: {{Lang}}: unrecognized language lawmaking: jp (assistance) ([Saibankan sotsui iinkai] Mistake: {{Lang}}: unrecognized language code: jp (help)) and [裁判官弾劾裁判所] Fault: {{Lang}}: unrecognized language code: jp (help) ([Saibankan dangai saibansho] Error: {{Lang}}: unrecognized language code: jp (aid)), which is established by Article 64 of the Constitution.[41] The quondam has a role similar to prosecutor and the latter is analogous to Court. 7 judges were removed by them.

Liechtenstein [edit]

Members of the Principality of liechtenstein Government tin can exist impeached earlier the State Court for breaches of the Constitution or of other laws.[42] : Article 62 Equally a hereditary monarchy the Sovereign Prince cannot be impeached as he "is not subject to the jurisdiction of the courts and does not have legal responsibleness".[42] : Article vii The aforementioned is true of whatsoever member of the Princely House who exercises the function of head of country should the Prince exist temporarily prevented or in preparation for the Succession.[42] : Article 7

Lithuania [edit]

In the Democracy of Lithuania, the president may be impeached by a 3-fifths majority in the Seimas.[43] President Rolandas Paksas was removed from office by impeachment on vi April 2004 after the Constitutional Court of Lithuania establish him guilty of having violated his oath and the constitution. He was the get-go European head of state to have been impeached.[44]

Kingdom of norway [edit]

Members of regime, representatives of the national assembly (Stortinget) and Supreme Court judges tin be impeached for criminal offenses tied to their duties and committed in office, according to the Constitution of 1814, §§ 86 and 87. The procedural rules were modeled after the U.S. rules and are quite similar to them. Impeachment has been used eight times since 1814, last in 1927. Many contend that impeachment has fallen into desuetude. In cases of impeachment, an appointed court (Riksrett) takes effect.

Philippines [edit]

Impeachment in the Philippines follows procedures similar to the United States. Under Sections2 and 3, Article XI, Constitution of the Philippines, the House of Representatives of the Philippines has the sectional power to initiate all cases of impeachment against the president, vice president, members of the Supreme Court, members of the Constitutional Commissions (Commission on Elections, Ceremonious Service Commission and the Committee on Audit), and the ombudsman. When a third of its membership has endorsed the impeachment articles, information technology is and then transmitted to the Senate of the Philippines which tries and decide, as impeachment tribunal, the impeachment case.[45]

A main difference from U.South. proceedings yet is that only one third of House members are required to approve the motion to impeach the president (equally opposed to a elementary majority of those present and voting in their U.Southward. counterpart). In the Senate, selected members of the House of Representatives act as the prosecutors and the senators act as judges with the Senate president presiding over the proceedings (the chief justice jointly presides with the Senate president if the president is on trial). Like the United States, to convict the official in question requires that a minimum of two thirds (i.east. 16 of 24 members) of all the members of the Senate vote in favor of conviction. If an impeachment attempt is unsuccessful or the official is acquitted, no new cases tin can be filed against that impeachable official for at to the lowest degree one total year.

Impeachment proceedings and attempts [edit]

President Joseph Estrada was the first official impeached by the Firm in 2000, simply the trial concluded prematurely due to outrage over a vote to open up an envelope where that motion was narrowly defeated by his allies. Estrada was deposed days later during the 2001 EDSA Revolution.

In 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008, impeachment complaints were filed against President Gloria Macapagal Approach, only none of the cases reached the required endorsement of 1⁄three of the members for transmittal to, and trial by, the Senate.

In March 2011, the Business firm of Representatives impeached Ombudsman Merceditas Gutierrez, becoming the second person to be impeached. In April, Gutierrez resigned prior to the Senate'due south convening every bit an impeachment court.

In December 2011, in what was described as "blitzkrieg style", 188 of the 285 members of the House of Representatives voted to transmit the 56-page Articles of Impeachment confronting Supreme Court chief justice Renato Corona.

To date, iii officials had been successfully impeached past the House of Representatives, and two were not convicted. The latter, Chief Justice Renato C. Corona, was convicted on 29 May 2012, by the Senate nether Article II of the Articles of Impeachment (for betraying public trust), with xx–three votes from the Senator Judges.

Peru [edit]

The outset impeachment process against Pedro Pablo Kuczynski, then the incumbent President of Peru since 2016, was initiated by the Congress of Peru on 15 Dec 2017. According to Luis Galarreta, the President of the Congress, the whole process of impeachment could take taken every bit little equally a week to complete.[46] This effect was part of the 2nd stage of the political crisis generated by the confrontation between the Government of Pedro Pablo Kuczynski and the Congress, in which the opposition Popular Strength has an absolute majority. The impeachment request was rejected by the congress on 21 December 2017, for failing to obtain sufficient votes for the deposition.[47]

Romania [edit]

The president can be impeached by Parliament and is then suspended. A referendum then follows to make up one's mind whether the suspended President should be removed from function. President Traian Băsescu was impeached twice by the Parliament: in 2007 and and then again in July 2012. A referendum was held on 19 May 2007 and a large majority of the electorate voted against removing the president from office. For the most recent pause a referendum was held on July 29, 2012; the results were heavily against the president, but the referendum was invalidated due to low turnout.[48] [ circular reference ]

Russia [edit]

Boris Yeltsin, every bit president of Russia, survived several impeachment attempts

In 1999, members of the State Duma of Russia, led by the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, unsuccessfully attempted to impeach President Boris Yeltsin on charges relating to his role in the 1993 Russian constitutional crisis and launching the Starting time Chechen State of war (1995–96); efforts to launch impeachment proceedings failed.[49] [50] [51]

Singapore [edit]

The Constitution of Singapore allows the impeachment of a sitting president on charges of treason, violation of the Constitution, corruption, or attempting to mislead the Presidential Elections Commission for the purpose of demonstrating eligibility to be elected as president. The prime number minister or at least ane-quarter of all members of Parliament (MPs) tin can pass an impeachment move, which can succeed only if at least half of all MPs (excluding nominated members) vote in favor, whereupon the chief justice of the Supreme Court volition appoint a tribunal to investigate allegations against the president. If the tribunal finds the president guilty, or otherwise declares that the president is "permanently incapable of discharging the functions of his office by reason of mental or physical infirmity", Parliament will hold a vote on a resolution to remove the president from part, which requires a three-quarters majority to succeed.[52] No president has ever been removed from office in this fashion.

South Africa [edit]

When the Union of South Africa was established in 1910, the only officials who could be impeached (though the term itself was not used) were the chief justice and judges of the Supreme Court of S Africa. The scope was broadened when the country became a republic in 1961, to include the country president. It was farther broadened in 1981 to include the new part of vice country president; and in 1994 to include the executive deputy presidents, the public protector and the Auditor-General. Since 1997, members of certain commissions established past the Constitution can also be impeached. The grounds for impeachment, and the procedures to exist followed, take inverse several times over the years.

S Korea [edit]

According to the Article 65 Clause one of Constitution of South Korea, if President, Prime Minister, or other state council members including Supreme Court and Ramble court members, violate the Constitution or other laws of official duty, the National Assembly can impeach them. Clause2 states the impeachment bill may exist proposed by one third or more than of the full members of the National Associates, and shall require majority voting and approved by 2 thirds or more than of the full members of the National Associates. This commodity too states that whatever person against whom a motility for impeachment has been passed shall be suspended from exercising his power until the impeachment has been adjudicated and shall not extend further than removal from public office, provided that it shall not exempt the person impeached from civil or criminal liability.

2 presidents take been impeached since the establishing of the South korea in 1948. Roh Moo-hyun in 2004 was impeached by the National Assembly but was overturned by the Constitutional Courtroom. Park Geun-hye in 2016 was impeached past the National Assembly, and the impeachment was confirmed past the Constitutional Court on March 10, 2017.[53] [54]

In Feb 2021, Gauge Lim Seong-geun of the Busan Loftier Court was impeached by the National Associates for meddling in politically sensitive trials, the get-go ever impeachment of a judge in Korean history. Unlike presidential impeachments, only a simple bulk is required to impeach.[55]

Turkey [edit]

In Turkey, according to the Constitution, the Grand National Assembly may initiate an investigation of the president, the vice president or whatever member of the Cabinet upon the proposal of uncomplicated majority of its total members, and within a period less than a month, the approval of three-fifths of the total members.[56] The investigation would be carried out by a committee of 15 members of the Assembly, each nominated by the political parties in proportion to their representation therein. The commission would submit its report indicating the outcome of the investigation to the speaker within two months. If the investigation is not completed inside this catamenia, the commission's time may be renewed for some other calendar month. Within x days of its submission to the speaker, the report would be distributed to all members of the Associates, and ten days after its distribution, the study would exist discussed on the floor. Upon the approval of two thirds of the total number of the Assembly by secret vote, the person or persons, well-nigh whom the investigation was conducted, may be tried before the Constitutional Court. The trial would be finalized inside three months, and if non, a one-time additional menstruation of 3 months shall be granted. The president, virtually whom an investigation has been initiated, may not call for an ballot. The president, who is bedevilled by the Court, would be removed from office.

The provision of this article shall besides utilise to the offenses for which the president allegedly worked during his term of role.

Ukraine [edit]

During the crisis which started in Nov 2013, the increasing political stress of the confront-down between the protestors occupying Independence Square in Kyiv and the State Security forces under the control of President Yanukovych led to deadly armed force being used on the protestors. Following the negotiated render of Kyiv's Metropolis Hall on sixteen February 2014, occupied past the protesters since November 2013, the security forces thought they could too retake "Maidan", Independence Square. The ensuing fighting from 17 through 21 February 2014 resulted in a considerable number of deaths and a more than generalised breach of the population, and the withdrawal of President Yanukovych to his support expanse in the East of Ukraine.

In the wake of the president's departure, Parliament convened on 22 Feb; it reinstated the 2004 Constitution, which reduced presidential authorisation, and voted impeachment of President Yanukovych every bit de facto recognition of his divergence from office as President of an integrated Ukraine. The president riposted that Parliament's acts were illegal equally they could pass into law merely by presidential signature.

Great britain [edit]

In the United Kingdom, in principle, everyone may exist prosecuted and tried by the 2 Houses of Parliament for any criminal offence.[57] The beginning recorded impeachment is that of William Latimer, 4th Baron Latimer during the Skillful Parliament of 1376. The latest was that of Henry Dundas, 1st Viscount Melville which started in 1805 and which ended with his acquittal in June 1806.[58] Over the centuries, the procedure has been supplemented past other forms of oversight including select committees, confidence motions, and judicial review, while the privilege of peers to trial simply in the House of Lords was abolished in 1948 (run across Judicial functions of the House of Lords § Trials), and thus impeachment, which has non kept upwards with modern norms of republic or procedural fairness, is generally considered obsolete.[57]

United States [edit]

United States president Donald Trump was impeached by the House of Representatives in 2019, and and then over again in 2021, with i calendar week left in part.

In the federal system, the Article 1 of the United States Constitution provides that the House of Representatives has the "sole Power of Impeachment" and the Senate has "the sole Ability to try all Impeachments".[59] Article Two provides that "The President, Vice President and all ceremonious Officers of the United states of america, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors."[60] In the U.s., impeachment is the showtime of two stages; an official may be impeached by a bulk vote of the Business firm, but conviction and removal from part in the Senate requires "the concurrence of two thirds of the members present".[61] Impeachment is analogous to an indictment.[62]

Co-ordinate to the House do manual, "Impeachment is a constitutional remedy to accost serious offenses against the organisation of authorities. Information technology is the first stride in a remedial procedure—that of removal from public function and possible disqualification from holding farther office. The purpose of impeachment is not penalization; rather, its function is primarily to maintain constitutional government."[63] Impeachment may exist understood as a unique process involving both political and legal elements.[three] [iv] [5] The Constitution provides that "Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall non extend farther than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and savour any Office of award, Trust or Profit under the The states: merely the Party bedevilled shall however exist liable and discipline to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, co-ordinate to Police force."[64] It is mostly accustomed that "a former President may be prosecuted for crimes of which he was acquitted by the Senate".[65]

The U.S. House of Representatives has impeached an official 21 times since 1789: four times for presidents, 15 times for federal judges, once for a Chiffonier secretarial assistant, and once for a senator.[66] Of the 21, the Senate voted to remove eight (all federal judges) from office.[66] The four impeachments of presidents were: Andrew Johnson in 1868, Bill Clinton in 1998, and Donald Trump twice: commencement in 2019, and a 2d time in 2021.[67] All 4 impeachments were followed by acquittal in the Senate.[66] An impeachment process was also commenced against Richard Nixon, merely he resigned in 1974 to avert likely removal from role.[68]

Near all state constitutions prepare forth parallel impeachment procedures for land governments, allowing the country legislature to impeach officials of the state government.[69] From 1789 through 2008, 14 governors have been impeached (including ii who were impeached twice), of whom vii governors were convicted.[70]

See also [edit]

  • List of impeachments of heads of state

References [edit]

  1. ^ a b "impeachment | Definition, Process, History, & Facts". Encyclopedia Britannica . Retrieved 15 Nov 2020.
  2. ^ Landau, Sidney; Brantley, Sheila; Davis, Samuel; Koenigsberg, Ruth, eds. (1997). Funk & Wagnall's Standard Desk Dictionary. Vol. ane (1996 ed.). U.s.a.: Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. p. 322. ISBN978-0-308-10353-five. ane. To charge (a high public official) before a legally constituted tribunal with criminal offense or misdemeanor in part. 2. To bring ignominy upon the honesty or validity of.
  3. ^ a b Michael J. Gerhardt. "Impeachment is the law. Saying 'political process' only helps Trump's narrative". Washington Post. while it'south true that politics are bound upwards in how impeachment plays out, it's a myth that impeachment is but political. Rather, it'due south the principal legal remedy that the Constitution expressly specifies to hold presidents accountable
  4. ^ a b c Michael J. Gerhardt (2019). The Federal Impeachment Process: A Constitutional and Historical Analysis (3d ed.). University of Chicago Printing. pp. 106–07. ISBN9780226554976. The ratification debates support the conclusion that 'other high Crimes and Misdemeanors' were not limited to indictable offenses merely rather included groovy offenses against the federal government. ... Justices James Wilson and Joseph Story expressed understanding with Hamilton's agreement of impeachment as a political proceeding and impeachable offenses as political crimes.
  5. ^ a b Gerhardt, Michael (2018). Impeachment: What Everyone Needs to Know. New York, North.Y.: Oxford University Press. p. twenty. ISBN978-0190903657. LCCN 2018013560. Impeachment has elements of both legal and political proceedings. Equally a result, it is a unique procedure.
  6. ^ a b c Davidson, Roger (2005). "Impeachment". Earth Book Encyclopedia. Vol. I x (2005 ed.). Chicago. p. 92. ISBN0-7166-0105-2.
  7. ^ "Impeachment". United kingdom Parliament Glossary . Retrieved five February 2021. Impeachment is when a peer or commoner is accused of 'high crimes and misdemeanours, across the reach of the law or which no other authority in the state will prosecute.'
  8. ^ Lawler, David (19 December 2019). "What impeaching leaders looks like effectually the globe". Axios . Retrieved 8 February 2021.
  9. ^ Huq, Aziz; Ginsburg, Tom; Landau, David. "Designing Better Impeachments: How other countries' constitutions protect against political free-for-alls". Boston Review . Retrieved viii February 2021. Constitutions in 9 democracies give a court—oft the land's constitutional court—the power to begin an impeachment; another 61 constitutions place the court at the end of the process.
  10. ^ Ignacio Arana Araya, To Impeach or Not to Impeach: Lessons from Latin America, Georgetown Journal of International Affairs (December 13, 2019).
  11. ^ Erskine, Daniel H. (2008). "The Trial of Queen Caroline and the Impeachment of President Clinton: Police force As a Weapon for Political Reform". Washington Academy Global Studies Law Review. 7 (1). ISSN 1546-6981.
  12. ^ Peter Brandon Bayer (23 May 2019). "The Constitution dictates that impeachment must non be partisan". The Chat. Noted scholars Ronald Rotunda and John Nowak explain that the Framers wisely intended the phrase "or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors" to include undermining the Constitution and similar, "smashing offenses confronting the federal authorities (like abuse of power) even if they are not necessarily crimes.' For case, Alexander Hamilton asserted that, while probable to be criminal acts, impeachable wrongdoings 'are those offenses which proceed from the misconduct of public men ... from the abuse or violation of some public trust.' James Madison urged that impeachment is appropriate for 'loss of chapters, or corruption ... [that] might exist fatal to the republic.'
  13. ^ a b "Impeachment". U.Due south. Constitution Annotated. Congressional Research Service – via Legal Data Found, Cornell Law School.
  14. ^ a b c Cole, J. P.; Garvey, T. (29 October 2015). "Report No. R44260, Impeachment and Removal" (PDF). Congressional Enquiry Service. pp. xv–sixteen. Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 December 2019. Retrieved 22 September 2016.
  15. ^ Hauss, Charles (29 December 2006). "Vote of confidence". Britannica . Retrieved 9 Feb 2021. {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  16. ^ a b Obeng, J.Pashington (1996). Asante Catholicism; Religious and Cultural Reproduction amid the Akan of Ghana. Vol. 1. ISBN978-90-04-10631-4.
  17. ^ a b Maciel, Lourenço (8 February 2020). "Was information technology a coup? Democracy and Constitutionality in the 2016 Brazilian Impeachment Process". Dilma Rousseff'southward Impeachment. Archived from the original on 24 March 2021. Retrieved 5 March 2021.
  18. ^ Andrew Jacobs (17 April 2016). "Brazil's Lower House of Congress Votes for Impeachment of Dilma Rousseff". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 3 January 2022. Retrieved xiii November 2016.
  19. ^ "Constitution of Croatia". § 105. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 June 2018. Retrieved 12 March 2017.
  20. ^ Ústava České republiky. Psp.cz. Retrieved on 2016-x-23.
  21. ^ Ústava České republiky. Psp.cz. Retrieved 2013-07-12.
  22. ^ "Czech President Vaclav Klaus faces treason charge". BBC News. iv March 2013. Retrieved 23 October 2016.
  23. ^ Rob Cameron (28 March 2013). "Constitutional Court throws out treason charges against ex-president Klaus". Radio Praha.
  24. ^ "Senát schválil ústavní žalobu na prezidenta republiky". 24 July 2019.
  25. ^ "The Danish Constitution".
  26. ^ "Tamilsagen 1986-1995". danmarkshistorien.dk.
  27. ^ "HUDOC". European Court of Human Rights.
  28. ^ "Denmark'south ex-immigraton minister set to face up impeachment trial". euronews. 14 Jan 2021.
  29. ^ "Denmark's ex-immigration minister convicted over aviary seeker policy". euronews. xiii Dec 2021.
  30. ^ "Rigsretten - Rigsretten har afsagt dom i sagen mod fhv. minister Inger Støjberg". rigsretten.dk.
  31. ^ "Folketinget har stemt: Inger Støjberg er ikke værdig til at sidde i Folketinget". www.medicodk. 21 December 2021.
  32. ^ "Le président de la République peut-il être destitué ? Et si oui, pour quelles raisons ?". Libération.fr. 25 July 2018. Archived from the original on 27 May 2019. Retrieved 17 March 2019.
  33. ^ a b "Basic Police of Hong Kong". basiclaw.gov.hk. Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Authorities. Archived from the original on 27 January 2015. Retrieved xiii Nov 2016.
  34. ^ "Magyarország Alaptörvénye—Hatályos Jogszabályok Gyűjteménye". net.jogtar.hu (in Hungarian). 25 April 2011. Retrieved five November 2019.
  35. ^ "Cardinal Law of Hungary". www.constituteproject.org . Retrieved five November 2019.
  36. ^ "The Prevention of Insults to National Accolade (Amendment) Human action of 1971" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 January 2017. Retrieved 2 July 2017.
  37. ^ Cowell, Alan (13 December 1991). "President of Italia is Making Political Waves". The New York Times.
  38. ^ "Italian republic parliament rejects bid to impeach President Napolitano". Reuters. xi February 2014.
  39. ^ Horowitz, Jason (28 May 2018). "Italian President'southward Loyalty to the Euro Creates Chaos". The New York Times. Archived from the original on iii January 2022.
  40. ^ "The Constitution of Nihon". Japanese Law Translation . Retrieved ten August 2020.
  41. ^ "裁判官弾劾裁判所公式サイト / トップページ （音声ブラウザ対応）". world wide web.dangai.go.jp.
  42. ^ a b c "Constitution of the Principality of Liechtenstein" (PDF). hrlibrary.umn.edu. Legal Service of the Government of the Principality of liechtenstein. 2003. Retrieved thirteen November 2016.
  43. ^ "The Constitution of the Republic of Republic of lithuania". Retrieved 4 April 2016.
  44. ^ "Lithuanian Parliament Removes Country'southward President After Casting Votes on Three Charges". The New York Times. 7 Apr 2004. Retrieved 4 April 2016.
  45. ^ Chan-Robles Virtual Law Library. "The 1987 Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines—Article Xi". Retrieved 25 July 2008.
  46. ^ "Peru'due south leader faces impeachment". Bbc.com. xv December 2017. Retrieved 28 Dec 2017.
  47. ^ "Lawmakers who helped Peru president survive impeachment bid say commonwealth won". Efe.com. 22 December 2017. Retrieved 28 December 2017.
  48. ^ ro:Referendumul pentru demiterea președintelui României, 2012
  49. ^ "Yeltsin impeachment hearings begin", The Guardian (May xiii, 1999).
  50. ^ David Hoffman, "Bid to Impeach Yeltsin Defeated", Washington Post (May 16, 1999).
  51. ^ Michael Wines, "Drive to Impeach Russian President Dies in Parliament", New York Times (May xvi, 1999).
  52. ^ "Constitution of the Democracy of Singapore—Singapore Statutes Online". /sso.agc.gov.sg. 2019.
  53. ^ Kim, Da-sol (eight December 2016). "Revisiting Roh Moo-hyun impeachment". The Korea Herald . Retrieved ix February 2021.
  54. ^ "Park Geun-hye fired as court upholds impeachment". Al Jazzera. 10 March 2017.
  55. ^ "Legislature impeaches judge for political meddling". Korea JoongAng Daily. 4 Feb 2021.
  56. ^ "Grand National Associates of Turkey" (PDF). tbmmgov.tr. 2018.
  57. ^ a b Simson Caird, Jack (half-dozen June 2016). "Commons Briefing papers CBP-7612" (PDF). Firm of Commons Library. Retrieved 14 May 2019.
  58. ^ Hutchison, Gary D (2017). "'The Manager in Distress': Reaction to the Impeachment of Henry Dundas, 1805–seven" (PDF). Parliamentary History. 36 (ii): 198–217. doi:ten.1111/1750-0206.12295.
  59. ^ House Practice: A Guide to the Rules, Precedents and Procedures of the House, chap. 27 (Impeachment). U.S. Government Publishing Office, p. 594 (quoting U.S. Const. fine art. I, Sec. two, cl. 5; Sec. 3, cl. 6.).
  60. ^ ArtII.S4.1.2.1 Offices Eligible for Impeachment, Constitution Annotated, Congress.gov.
  61. ^ U.South. Constitution. Article I, § three, clause 6. 12 November 2009.
  62. ^ House Exercise: A Guide to the Rules, Precedents and Procedures of the Business firm, chap. 27 (Impeachment). U.S. Government Publishing Office, p. 594: "An impeachment is instituted past a written accusation, chosen an 'Commodity of Impeachment,' which states the crime charged. The articles serve a purpose similar to that of an indictment in an ordinary criminal proceeding. Transmission Sec. 609."
  63. ^ House Exercise: A Guide to the Rules, Precedents and Procedures of the House, chap. 27 (Impeachment). U.S. Regime Publishing Office, p. 591.
  64. ^ Fine art I.S3.C7.1.1 Judgment in Cases of Impeachment: Overview, Constitution Annotated.
  65. ^ "Memorandum: Whether a Former President May Be Indicted and Tried for the Same Offenses for Which He was Impeached by the House and Acquitted past the Senate", U.South. Department of Justice, Office of Legal Counsel (August 18, 2000).
  66. ^ a b c "U.Southward. Senate: Impeachment". www.senate.gov . Retrieved 19 September 2018.
  67. ^ Maggie Astor (13 Jan 2021). "The Impeachment Proceedings That Came Before". The New York Times.
  68. ^ Gerhardt, Michael J. (2000). The Federal Impeachment Process: A Constitutional and Historical Analysis . University of Chicago Press. p. 27. ISBN9780226289571. attempted Impeachment of William O. Douglas.
  69. ^ "Impeachment and the states: A look at the history, provisions in place". knowledgecenter.csg.org. [ permanent dead link ]
  70. ^ "Research Response: Governors' Impeachments in U.S. History", Illinois General Assembly Legislative Research Unit of measurement (July 8, 2008).

External links [edit]

crusewitheme37.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment

0 Response to "If the President Is Impeached"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel